Selecting outstanding hedge funds is vital to consistently achieving superior absolute and risk-adjusted returns. Please visit Marketplace/Samples for profiles of top funds and examples of research reports. This section outlines a process successful institutions use, covering the following topics:
Investment objectives vary among investors, but generally include return expectations, risk tolerance, liquidity needs, asset mixes, investment time horizons, leverage limits, currency choices, and tax considerations. A clear understanding of investment objectives and constraints helps to quickly narrow down the pool of funds to consider.
Investors can obtain information of funds and fund managers through SEC’s IAPD site, industry conferences, prime brokers, subscription-based databases, fund and manager websites, and google searches, among others.
There are many thousands of hedge funds, and materials you need to process can be overwhelming. Hence, it is critical that investors are clear about their investment objectives and constraints to quickly narrow down the pool of funds to consider. With a smaller group of prospects, investors can then effectively research individual funds.
The purpose of hedge fund research is to find funds that can consistently deliver future absolute and risk-adjusted returns superior to their peers and benchmarks.
An average hedge fund outperforms its benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis but underperforms in absolute returns, as we have shown in Type of Hedge Funds. While superior risk-adjusted returns are valuable, investors desire high absolute returns as well.
Fortunately, there are huge performance dispersions among hedge funds. In each strategy and asset category, there are usually a handful of funds that outperform benchmarks on both absolute and risk-adjusted returns. It is highly beneficial to research and identify these winners. Furthermore, hedge funds are complex operations. A thorough research and due diligence also mitigate risks and prevent fraud.
Areas where established institutions would examine include:
Hedge fund research is a labor-intensive process. This list does not intend to be exhaustive, but a manager may not grant individual investors full access to info and people as it does for institutions. Also, while many tend to focus on returns and other quantitative metrics, it is our experience that qualitative assessments are vital in providing insight into how a fund manager tends to perform in the future.
Collecting data, conducting research, and carrying out hedge fund due diligence are intertwined, and hedge fund selection is an iterative process. Although specifics may vary from one institutional investor to the other, major due diligence tasks include:
Authenticate: Verify legal documents, performance data, risk parameters, key staff background and experience through regulatory filings, administrative reports, audited financial statements, interviews, et al.
Background Check: Conduct background checks of the fund, the management company, and their senior staff in the front and back offices.
Service Provider Interview: Interview custodian banks, prime brokers, law firms, and especially administrators and accounting firms. Talk to independent directors of the fund. You will need the fund manager’s consent to formally check references and conduct interviews. Do it formally as well as informally chat with people to independently verify important facts and data.
Site Visit: Visit the fund and its manager at their main office. Meet and interview principals and key front and back-office staff. Double-check all key areas of the hedge fund research and due diligence list.
Institutions often have both formal and informal processes to allocate their investment capital.
Informally an analyst approaches an authorized principal of a firm about a small initial allocation to a fund. The analyst presents the research and due diligence findings and makes an investment case. If convinced, the principal allocates an amount at his discretion, within the limit of his/her authorization.
In a formal process, a senior staff coordinates the preparation of the investment proposals. These proposals typically include investment summaries making cases for allocations, backed by the research and due diligence findings, macro/market environment and asset/investment strategy outlooks, and current and post allocation portfolio compositions and risk exposures, et al.
Investment committee member review these proposals before they meet. During the meeting, a chairperson facilitates and presentations, Q&A, and often spirited debates before casting votes. Most firms require a unanimous yes vote to invest in a candidate.
Automated page speed optimizations for fast site performance